How can one be subjective with an issue like this? It caused Van Jones to resign. Van Jones was Obama’s “Green Jobs” czar. Yet after his statement that perhaps 9/11 was an inside job after signing a 2004 petition saying that it was.
Well, was it?
That is a debate within a debate. However, the fact remains ten years later we have the aftermath of 9/11. To get better equipped with the understanding of these “conspiracy” people it took a night of google and coffee.
How do you explain the “Doomsday Plane” in the air at the same time?
What is up with the NORAD excercise on the same day concerning planes crashing into the twin towers and then it actually happening?
Why was there no debree of a plan crash at the Pentgaon? (Yet video of a cruise missle leaked?)
Why Why Why?
It just doesn’t make sense. It leaves many, such as myself, on the fence. It seems almost too brilliant. Yet at the same time makes me sound unpatriotic. When Bush was president it was hip to say it was an inside job to stimulate war and expand the empire. We all know a good ole fashioned war is great for the economy. Yet now with Obama – that Republican / Democrat divide in society and our minds – makes it even more taboo. It shouldn’t be. We should be able to discuss this.
We found out years later The Gulf of Tonkin incident was fabricated.
Years later we discover Pearl Harbor was intentially attacked so we could enter the war.
Being attacked has a funny way of changing public opinion and polls. Unless it’s Libya. Then that is NATO. Not America. Yet America contributes the most money and men to NATO. So basically it’s us – but not us. Right? Think so.
9/11 is a touchy subject. Yet it deserves to be examined.